Conflitos de convicções em bioética clínica (Conflict of convictions on Clinical Bioethics) - DOI: 10.5752/P.2175-5841.2013v11n30p607
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
O conflito de convicções traz consigo frequentes interrogações éticas em diferentes esferas das relações sociais. As convicções religiosas não são as únicas nesse sentido. Este ensaio usa um método interdisciplinar em vista de esclarecer alguns conceitos e critérios subjacentes ao tema, que podem ajudar no discernimento ético de tais conflitos. A Bioética Clínica é aqui uma particularização temática que ajuda uma concentração do discurso, ao mesmo tempo em que permite o aproveitamento desta reflexão para outras esferas. Ajuda também a perceber a estreita relação das convicções pessoais com a esfera pública em torno de questões vitais. Entre seus resultados, este ensaio ressalta que os conflitos de convicções podem ser fonte de benefícios para a convivência na sociedade plural. Seus desafios éticos se concentram na necessária abertura das convicções ao diálogo com os diferentes. No exercício do diálogo, a reflexão da Bioética se distingue da Biopolítica e sugere que as convicções subjetivas por vezes se vejam contraditadas por ordenamentos jurídicos, antes que se amadureçam consensos sobre critérios éticos.
Palavras-chave: Convicções – Bioética Clínica – Conflitos éticos
Abstract
the conflict of convictions brings frequent ethical questions in different spheres of social relations. Religious convictions are not the only in this sense. This essay uses an interdisciplinary method in order to clarify some concepts and criteria underlying this issue, which can help in ethical discernment of such conflicts. Clinical Bioethics is a particularization theme here that helps a concentration of discourse, while allowing the use of this reflection to other spheres. It also helps to understand the close relationship of personal convictions with the public sphere around vital issues. Among their results, this paper points out that conflicts of convictions can be a source of benefits to living in a plural society. His ethical challenges are mainly pointed to a necessary openness to dialogue with the different. In exercising this dialogue, reflection of Bioethics is distinguished from Biopolitics and suggests that the subjective convictions sometimes find themselves contradicted by legal before they ripen consensus on ethical criteria.
Key words: Convictions - Clinical Bioethics - Ethical Conflicts
Downloads
Article Details
I (We) submit the present work, which is original and unpublished, authored by me (us), for evaluation by HORIZONTE – Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciências da Religião, and agree to grant the corresponding publication rights to Editora PUC Minas. I (We) declare that its content, in whole or in part, may be copied, distributed, edited, remixed, and used to create other works, in accordance with applicable copyright and related rights legislation, in any medium, print or electronic, provided that proper credit is given to the text and authorship, including reference to HORIZONTE.
I (We) further declare that there are no conflicts of interest of a personal, academic, institutional, or financial nature between the subject addressed, the author(s), and any companies, institutions, or individuals.
I (We) acknowledge that HORIZONTE is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Under this license, I (we) authorize, “to maximize the dissemination of information,” that others may share, distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon this work, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original authorship.